Find weaknesses. Prioritize fixes. Retest what changed. Explore a custom, agent assisted workflow for security testing of the systems you own or are explicitly authorized to assess.
Free consultation. Written scope and quote before work begins. Supported environments, methods, integrations, and reviewer responsibilities are agreed during scoping.
Scope one focused workflow or combine these agent roles. They support a designated security reviewer; they do not independently decide which systems to attack or which changes to make.
Work from an approved asset list and permitted test outputs. Organize exposure, access control, configuration, and application findings, with sources and uncertainties clearly labeled. No testing outside the agreed scope.
Help a human reviewer reproduce suspected issues using approved, controlled checks. Record affected assets, conditions, and supporting evidence. Keep unverified findings distinct from confirmed vulnerabilities.
Prepare an executive summary and a technical finding register with impact, severity rationale, evidence, scope limits, and recommended next steps. A reviewer validates conclusions before the report is released.
Draft remediation tasks, connect each issue to its owner, and prepare an authorized retest plan. After your team approves and implements changes, record what was retested, what is resolved, and what remains open.
Your team approves a staging environment and test accounts. An agent organizes permitted test results and flags a possible access control issue. The security reviewer validates the finding within the agreed limits, and the reporting agent drafts the evidence and remediation task. After your developers make the fix, an approved retest records the outcome.
The boundary: no access to another customer’s live data, no production changes, and no expansion to additional systems without separate approval.
Confirm ownership or testing permission, assets, exclusions, methods, timing, data handling, reviewers, and stop rules in writing.
Run only approved checks. Keep activity logs and evidence, pause at agreed limits, and route uncertain or consequential steps to a person.
Review findings, business impact, recommended fixes, and remaining uncertainty with your technical and business owners.
Your team approves changes. Retest within renewed or still valid authorization and document the final status and remaining risk.
Authorized assets and methods, test coverage, activity records, exclusions, and limitations. Evidence retention, access, and deletion requirements are agreed before testing.
A prioritized report, technical evidence, remediation recommendations, an owner ready task list, and a retest status record for the checks included in your engagement.
Start with a web application, API, or other environment you control. The consultation establishes what is supportable, who has authority to approve testing, and whether staging or isolated test accounts are appropriate. Third party and shared services require the relevant permissions and provider rules to be satisfied.
Denial of service testing, social engineering, destructive activity, autonomous exploitation, access beyond the authorized assets, and changes to production systems are excluded by default. Any proposed expansion requires a separate review and explicit written authorization; not every method or environment will be supported.
No. Testing is limited by its scope, methods, access, and timing. Agents and human reviewers can miss issues. A report is not a guarantee of security, a certification, or a substitute for ongoing security operations or a required independent assessment.
Describe your security objective, the general type of system, and who will approve the work. Do not submit passwords, access tokens, sensitive records, or live vulnerability evidence through the public form. Agree a secure exchange process before sharing technical details.
Discuss the environment, the result you need, and a budget that fits. The team will propose a scope, approval points, deliverables, and pricing before any testing or development.